Homo FloresiensisPerformation of the Sun Man (Solor Purba East Nusa-Maluku) with Oppenheimer Proof

Homo FloresiensisPerformation of

Image source: http://donsmaps.com/images23/florescave.jpg

By Chris Boro Tokan

preliminary

A small fossil skeleton of 'Hobit', estimated to be 18,000 years old, was found in Liang Bua, a limestone cave in Ruteng, Manggarai Flores, around 2003. The hobit skeleton fossil found was a woman, much smaller than normal human size. In addition to these fossils, in Liang Bua also found Giant Rat fossils of cats, Elephant Elephants called Stegodon, and fossils Crocodile Komodo. It also found tools made of stone, like that used by early humans Homo Erectus. Although the tools found in Liang Bua are much smaller.

The female hobit skeleton fossil found in Liang Bua, announced as a new human species, "Homo Floresiensis" aka "Man from Flores". But the mention of the fossil as a new man is still reaping controversy. As published by the Sydney Morning Herald, Thursday, November 19, 2009, scientists still declare 'hobbit' which is found as an unknown species. It is debatable whether Homo Floresiensis is a new species of our ancestors or early humans suffering from genetic disorders that make it miniature / dwarf.

The study of the discovery of hobit women (Homo Floresiensis) by William Jungers and Karen Baab (two United States scientists) reinforces the theory that Homo Florensiesis is a species of human ancestor, and the smallness of body size is not due to disease disorders. The study, published in Britain's Royal Statistical Society magazine in December 2009, is based on skeletal and bone observations. It is estimated that the size of the hobbit, approximately 106 centimeters in height and weighs 30-35 kilograms. In addition to its small size, the size of the fossil head is also much smaller than the normal human head size. Jungers and Baab also denied the opinions of experts who say the small brain size of hobit flores caused by abnormalities. Because according to Jungers and Baab, brain size can not be used to justify the intelligence of the creature. Especially from the skull can be seen that the brain 'hobit flores' is much different from the ape brain, although in terms of size in a glance almost the same.

Through funding from the Australian Research Institute, Jungers and Baab along with Australian scientists continued their research work on hobit flores for five years (from 2010), to determine the status of hobit flores. "We will focus on finding other skeletons," Jungers said. "If we dig up and find the Homo erectus skeleton in the same location, then the theory that small bodies due to genetic disorders would be more recognized, but if we found other hobble frames, it would be our hypothesis that there are human species that older than Homo erectus, stronger, "he added (in Viva News, Monday, June 28, 2010, 12:03 pm).

Human Dwarf Vs Giant Man and Flores Endemic Area

The discovery of Homo Floresiensis / Hobit Flores (the Floral Woman of Flores), which is stunted when confronted with the massive / gigantic Homo Erectus (Homo Floresiensis vs. Homo Erectus), can be traced in Scripture. As summarized by Arysio Santos through his 30 years of research: "ATLANTIS The Lost Continent Finally Found," The Devinitive Localization of Plato's Lost Civilization (2005), is an Indonesian subdivision of the World Plateau's Lost Civilization (2009: p. 126 and 574) ; "Dwarf Homo Floriensis and the gigantic Homo Erectus of Asia Homo Erectus is quite possibly the 'giants' whose existence is mentioned in Genesis 6, while the very small Homo Floriensis, less than a meter high, could be human dwarfs or goblins that are often spoken of in ancient myths about Heaven. " Compare the duel between David (personification of dwarf human) versus Goliath (gigantic human personification) in the Old Testament Scriptures.

Starting from Genesis 6, certainly abort the view of Hanneke Meijer of the Dutch Biodiversity Research Center, who believes that after the isolation period of the island of flores, homo erectus adapts and evolves into hobits. Although many archaeologists disagree that the early humans of the small, brain-shaped Flores evolved from homo erectus. While Arysio Santos is an opponent of Darwin's theory of evolution, affirming the word of the Gospel (the Christian Scriptures), the gigantic man on earth (Homo Erectus) and God's chosen man on earth (homo floresiensis). An enormous natural disaster that selects different kinds of people, and the spirit of civilization remains eternal through the diffusion of civilization, not through evolution.

Again reiterated by Arysio Santos, "that up until now most people have mistakenly believed that world-class disasters such as the Flood of the Universe and the death of Atlantis are impossible from the geological side." Many scholars, too, followThe existence of Flores (NTT), NTB, Maluku, North Maluku, Sulawesi, can be observed through the division of Indonesian territory within the Wallace-Weber line divided into Three Plains: 1. Sahul Plain (Eastern Part), which includes Irian Island and Aru Islands, plus Australia ; 2. The Sunda Plain (Western Part), which includes Java, Borneo, Bali, Sumatra, Malacca, India, China): 3. Central Plains, including NTT, NTB, Maluku, Sulawesi (Compare to Dr Harold K. Voris, Curator and Head of Zoology Department at Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois, contained in Arysio Santos pp. 104 and 150).

The Wallace-Weber line, a line that confirms the character of Flora-Fauna in the 3 plains. One of the characters that Fauna located in the Central Plains, also found in the plains of Sahul, there are found Fauna similarities in the Sunda Plain. In the sense that the Central Plain, as a dividing plot, gives or divides to the Plains of S ahul and to the Sundanese Plain. While certain fauna is only found in Central Plains Area (endemic fauna), not found in the plains of Sahul or the Sundanese Plain.

If Wallace-Weber's line of endemic fauna could pinpoint the hobit of flores, then Jungers's hope in further research found other hobble flores, thus confirming the hypothesis that there is an older human species from Homo erectus can be answered. At the same time the affirmation of the gigantic human distinction which is contained in Scripture with the dwarfs or goblins that are often spoken of in the ancient myths about Heaven.

Proof of Oppenheimer and the Discovery of Homo Floresiensis

A Professor of Genetics from Oxford University named Stephen Oppenheimer in his book EDEN IN THE EAST, 1998 is indoctrinated in the eyes of the hearts and minds of the world, that when we look at the distribution of the three generations of maternal grandmother Asia, the mother of Southeast Asia, and the motives Polynesian, the key location holding all three is East Indonesia (see Figure 31 on Genetic History of Polynesian Motifs, page 278). The older Asian grandmother's version, with only one single substitution, has so far not been found in neighboring Melanesian areas but prevalent in Eastern Indonesia to the border with Melanesia. The territory of Nusa Tenggara and Maluku differs from other Southeast Asia in this case has three generations: Asian matriarchy is piled here with his Southeast Asian girl with her Polynesian motive grandson with three substitutions. This is further proof of the population's beauty.

Oppenheimer's proof that: "Here in Eastern Indonesia, this has a ratio of 20% between Austronesian and non-Austronesian speakers in Nusa Tenggara and Maluku Islands, namely Alor, Flores, Hiri, Ternate and Timor.Polysia motives absent further west in Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia and Indo-Can The diversity of polynesian motifs is also spread across Maluku and Nusa Tenggara, suggesting the ancestors of these remote populations as the site of their origins. " … Martin Richards from the Oxford University laboratory estimated the time of origin of motives in East Indonesian people and gained a figure of about 17,000 years ago. The Polynesian motive distribution seems to have built a kind of genetic bridge between the Oceania linguistic region to the east and the Middle East -Polinesia to the west, but also propose a different starting point and origination time to the first Austronesian carriage (read: deployment, pen) to Oceania. The Polynesian motifs thought to be held by Austronesian women came from Mainland Asia, and left Southeast Asia 3,500 years ago, instead of having a local Maluku stamp dated 17,000 years ago, and no place of origin anywhere near the west of the Wallace Line, Philippines, Taiwan or China. Not only is Polynesian motive limited to the closed Wallacian territories to the tip of West Papua, but as in Papua New Guinea it assumes that Austronesian markers are again equally mixed to the non-Austronesian speaking islands as well, supporting the genetic proof of the beauty much larger (p.276).

The absence of polynesian motifs in Taiwan, the Philippines, and much of Western Indonesia and its local beauty some 17,000 years ago in western Indonesia is the strongest evidence against (p.276) ekpress trains (ie, spreading), 3,500 years ago. The hypothesis of an earlier Austronesian maritime expansion into the Pacific still persists. One thing that Polynesian motifs do not tell us is where the location of the east to Samoa expands, whether from the northern coast of Papua New Guinea or a fresh migration from Eastern Indonesia. It is helpful to see the answer to this question through the eyes of the layman but by countingThe first skull of the species, later referred to as Homo Floresiensis or Man Fores, was discovered in September 2003. It was female, standing as high as about a meter, and weighed only 25 kilograms. He is thought to be about 30 years old when he died 18,000 years ago. His skull and bones are found in a sedimentary location in the cave of Liang Bua, where some stone tools and bones of dwarf elephant, rodents as big as dogs, giant tortoises, and Komodo bones. Comparison of skull size Homo floresiensis with modern human skull, Homo sapiens. Because of its size, Homo floresienses is considered the most spectacular discovery in the paleoanthropology world since half a century, and is described as the most extreme human species ever found.

They lived in Flores some 13,000 years ago, which means they existed when modern humans (Homo sapiens) also exist. "Finding creatures that walk on two legs and small brains at the time period in which modern humans have existed is something very amazing," said Peter Brown, a paleoanthropologist from the University of New England in New South Wales, Australia. "This discovery is completely unexpected," said Chris Stringer, director of the Human Origins program at the Natural History Museum in London. "Finding ancient humans in Flores is already great, that they are only one meter in size and have brains like the chimpanzee brain is more amazing, and the fact that they existed 20,000 years ago, where the ancestors of modern humans might have met them were really great. "

Researchers estimate these dwarfs lived in Flores since about 95,000 years ago to at least 13,000 years ago. They based this theory on carbon calculations of bones and stone tools found with fossils. These dwarfs may be hunters because they are also found blades of stone knives, arrows or spears, and other cutting tools. These findings indicate that the genus Homo is more varied and more flexible in its adaptability than the original estimate. The genus Homo itself includes modern humans (Homo sapiens), Homo erectus, Homo habilis, and Neandertals, characterized by relatively large brain cavities, upright posture, and capable of making equipment.

"Homo floresiensis is in addition to the list of human species that live at the same time as modern humans, although the body is smaller, the brain is smaller, and has anatomical body that is a primitive and modern blend, this species is still included in the genus Homo. these dwarfs evolved from the normal human size of the Homo erectus population that reached Flores about 840,000 years ago. "Physically they are the same size as the children of modern humans of three years, but with the brain cavity is only a third," said Richard Roberts , a geochronologist from the University of Wollongong, Australia. "They have longer arms, thicker brow bones, slanted foreheads, and have no chin." Her lower jaw is filled with large, blunt teeth like Australopithecus teeth, early humans living in Africa from three million (3,000,000) last year.The front teeth are smaller than modern human teeth L the Flores human eye is large and round, and the hip bones are primitive, ape-like. While overall they do not look like modern humans, some of their behavior is really human-like.

These Flores people use fire in the fireplace to cook. They also hunt stegodons, a kind of primitive dwarf elephants that live there. Despite the dwarfs, a stegodon can weigh 1,000 kilograms, and is definitely a big challenge for hunters with body size like children. This means that hunting should be done with effective communication and planning, the researchers said. Almost all the stegodon fossils associated with the dwarfs came from young animals, suggesting that the men chose to hunt for small stegodons. From the fossils found, the Floresese food includes fish, frogs, snakes, turtles, birds and rodents.

They are not the kind of fools that have managed to survive alongside our kind for at least 30,000 years without us knowing it. They can also make some stone tools, hunt down pygmy elephants, and cross at least two seas to reach Flores from Asia. And unique with a brain that is only one-third of our brains. However, they, along with the dwarf elephants, became extinct due to large volcanic eruptions.

Conclusive Thoughts

Certainly before Oppenheimer's study of early human deployment, the Wallace-Weber Line was refined by Thomas Huxley, tThe dispersion studied by Oppenheimer further illustrates the diaspora skeleton at the breaking of the mass of continent 3 (mass extinction 1) that ended the Mesozoic Age. Arysio Santos became more specifically appointed in the book "ATLANTIS THE LOST CONTINENT FINALLY FOUND", 1997 was translated as "INDONESIA WORLD BIRTH CENTER OF WORLD CITIZEN", 2009 actually explains the Diaspora during the late Neozikum / end of the Ice Age (mass extinction 2). Although Arysio Santos pointed to HEAVEN IN EAST in the Sunda exposure between Java-Kalimantan-Sumatra. Most importantly, however, the details of his explanation of the spreading of man after the end of the ice age (Noah's flood) were to aid understanding of Oppenheimer's study. So if to the NORTH it became a civilization of CHINA, to WEST become INDIA Civilization. Then shifted to EGYPT (pyramid), to GREEK becoming PHILOSOPHY (LOGIKA, ETIKA, ESTETICA), to ROMAWI into CRISTIAN CROSS, to ARAB being ISLAM-STARS. Then through modern AGAMA as a MODERNIZATION gateway. then appear SCIENCE KNOWLEDGE as if the BEGINNING OF CIVILIZATION & CULTURE is from WEST.

So, indeed, the NEOLITICAL REVOLUTION that has taken the world of that time and up to now, with advances in China, India, Egypt, Greece, etc., comes from POROS (Far East-the furthest West). Until now still a mystery of how the neolithic revolution took place, such brilliant successes of that time, which continue to inspire progress until the present and of course will come later, how can it be explained by science ?. To the extent that Karl Marx was frustrated with his materialist philosophy, then accused the revolution of the neolithic as the revolution of the MAGIC. Thus the discovery of homo floresiensis actually also explains the pivot point that mediates the mystery of the Giant human explanation with the Little Man or the Primitive Man with the Modern Man. Because of the catastrophes (mass extinctions 1 and 2) at the end of the mesozoic era and at the end of the neozoic / end of the ice age period caused human, surviving flora, fauna to spread to various parts of the world at that time. But it can be understood and understood in the ancient philosophy of the shaft (Solor) with the symbol of the snake as the ancient sun: "Koten pana doan, Ikung gawe lakan naan tutu, nahku nuan tou geniku uliten-empatan muren te Tukak-tukan", meaning "spread far to the west (Koten pana doan) and move on to the east (Ikung gawe lela) to eternity to be a witness of the times (nuan tutu), but still one day always returns to the shaft / source (nuanku nuan tou geniku uliten-empatan muren te Tukak -tukan) ".

Reflect !!! … not only is Karl Marx frustrated, as G. W. F. Hegel with his Idealism philosophy is unable to explain it. Not until the philosophers alone, but the LORD-was frustrated, to the point of destroying the language (communication) between them as they built the tower of Babel to match the LORD. What did the Lord say: "… from now on what they plan and do will succeed, then have to stop them" !!! This means that if it is a revolution (tower of babel) for the glory of God and humanity of humanity, surely God does not stop. However, because of their arrogance to emulate or exceed the LORD, in their effort to build the tower of babel became a problem (Compare Genesis 11: 1-9).

Philosopher G.W.F. Hegel with his critical philosophy in his History Philosophy (The Original Theory of Philosophy of History, Dover Publication, Inc., 1956), has dissected the philosophy of life as a Spirit (the Word). Only Hegel can be limited to affirming that life begins from the Spirit of Idealism (MIND / LOGIKA), as the beginning (thesis). Corrected by Karl Marx (antithesis), that life starts from the real Spirit (Materialism / Ethics). Hegel's thesis is further known as the philosophy of Idealism, the antithesis of Marx known as the philosophy of Materialism. Understanding the life life (in Poros Earth) of the Solar Islands (Maluku-Sulawesi-Nusa Tenggara), this Hegel philosophy is mentioned as Taran Wanan (thesis) / Western Philosophy, while Marx's philosophy as Taran Neki (antithesis) Eastern Philosophy . While the Ancient Solor Philosophy (PANCASILA / Aesthetics) as a synthesis is the Axis Philosophy, inspired in the dawn son of Bung Karno during the exile in Ende-Flores.

Axis philosophy reconciles Western philosophy (Hegel) with Eastern philosophy (Marx): KODA / SABDA / ROH. Then there is the opinion that the Chinese (Eastern Philosophy) for material wealth, western people for the sophistication of the mind (Western Philosophy), while the lamaholot of conscience, atadiken (human). Or the philosopher of Plato with his TWO WORLD philosophy (The World of Soul / Hegel and the World of Body-Raga / Marx.) So unite the SOUL with the Body is: ROH / Pancasila-Bung Karno The Oriental (CHINA) may have material power (body / ), the West can be great (rich) mind (soul

Related Post